Let’s unpack the difference between true decoding and sight-word memorization and how each affects comprehension.
⸻
1. What happens when a reader memorizes words
If a child has not built decoding skills but instead relies on memorization, they often recognize words only as visual shapes (like logos). This can work for a limited number of familiar words, but it places heavy demands on working memory because:
• Each word must be retrieved as an isolated unit from memory.
• The brain has no system to generate the pronunciation or meaning if the word is unfamiliar.
• This strategy doesn’t scale to the tens of thousands of words needed for fluent reading.
As a result, comprehension suffers because working memory is being consumed by word recall — leaving less capacity for constructing meaning.
⸻
2. What happens when a reader decodes
When a reader uses phonics-based decoding:
• They break words into predictable sound-symbol patterns.
• The process becomes automatic with practice, shifting from conscious effort to fluent retrieval.
• Decoding connects words to the language system in the brain (phonology + meaning), allowing unknown words to be figured out on the spot.
Because decoding is systematic and generative, it reduces working memory load compared to pure memorization. This frees attention for comprehension.
⸻
3. Would switching from memorization to decoding improve comprehension?
Yes — teaching decoding almost always strengthens comprehension in the long run. Here’s why:
• Automatic word recognition: Once decoding skills are internalized, readers build a strong “orthographic lexicon” (sight vocabulary grounded in phonics), making word recognition faster and easier.
• Generative power: They can tackle unfamiliar words without guessing or rote memorization.
• Working memory freed: The brain doesn’t have to work so hard pulling up whole words from memory, leaving more capacity for building meaning.
• Language connections: Decoding strengthens the link between print, speech sounds, and meaning — which directly supports comprehension.
⸻
✅ So, in short: pulling words from memory by shape is inefficient and does interfere with comprehension. Shifting to decoding (even if it feels harder at first) ultimately builds automaticity, which improves comprehension because it frees up cognitive resources and connects words to the language system.
⸻